Information merely doesn't lay there in a data base waiting to be
scooped out and plopped onto some consumer's plate. Information varies in
consistency and richness. Different parts of information go better
together than others. A number of data model archetypes have been
proposed for organizing information. These archetypes are much like
culinary techniques in a couple of important ways.
Data models are a matter of taste. Some people prefer spice. Some prefer
salt. Others want a little sweet. People are different. Information
problems are different. Information arrangements are different. While it is
true that all data models are able to store the same information, different
models can emphasize the different parts of information that the data
modeler finds important.
Variety remains important. No matter how much you like broiled lobster,
you don't eat it every single day. An occasional newburg, or even a scampi,
can fill in the nutritional gaps. In data models, it's remarkable how many
practitioners only try to understand a single approach. It's like calling
someone a "cook" when their favorite culinary implement is a
microwave oven.
Data file
The notion of being able to collect information into a single container
is a prerequisite for all of the rest of the data models. The remaining
data models can add structure by specifying a format, but the data file
model can handle all the formats.
As a container, a data file is like a shopping cart, a grocery bag,
a picnic basket, or a lunch bucket. Some data files provide for different
segments like a TV dinner. Some data files can contain more uniform
contents like tin cans or bread boxes.
|
Flat file
If a text file is like a whole loaf of bread, then
flat files slice up the loaf. You might also slice up the salami, but
you're talking about a separate flat file.
Loosely, flat files
view information as an ordered collection of "records." Well-defined
subsets of each record are known as "fields." Each data field encapsulates a
well defined data type (TEXT, NUMBERS, DATES) and contains a single value.
Carving something into smaller pieces makes both food and information
easier to manipulate.
There's no best way to divide up something into parts. Consider potatoes.
The data file approach is like serving a whole baked potato. The flat file
breaks the potato up in more or less uniform pieces: sliced thin chips,
julienne-sliced fries, or diced for hash browns.
|
Hierarchical
If flat files look at
information in slices, hierarchical data bases look at information as a
ordered collection of different kinds of slices, like a club sandwich. You
start with a slice of bread. Butter it. Add a slice of bologna. Hmmmm.
Better make that two slices. Cheese? Yes. Lettuce? OK. Onion? Better
skip that. Mustard or mayo? Lay on the top bread slice. Cut diagonally.
The hierachical data model provides a mechanism to associate related, but
not identical, records together. In data processing, this eliminates a lot of
redundancy.
The sequential approach of the hierarchical model makes the solution
ideal for mass production engineering. This is good for making a large number
of the same sandwich, or passing a sandwich from one station to another
before delivering the result to a customer.
A good example of this is when you follow a recipe's step-by-step
instructions.
|
Network

If hierarchical data bases look at information like an
assembly-line sandwich, network data bases look at information as a food
service table in a delicatessen where sandwiches may be ordered custom-made
and substitutions are welcomed. There's more than one way to make a
sandwich.
In comparison to the hierarchical model, the network data model provides
additional ways to associate records of different types. In fact, a
network model could incorporate multiple hierarchical models
simultaneously.
You could compare this with pizza home delivery. It doesn't much
matter what route the delivery driver takes, or how many other stops
the driver makes before delivering your pizza in a timely manner. Or
consider how you might fix a single meal. Several recipes could be
followed freely and simultaneously.
|
Relational
No matter how you slice it, bologna is still bologna.
In a way, the relational data model is just like a collection of flat files.
Before relational purists get into an uproar, a number of subtle differences
do exist. As a model, relational model is more abstract. It ignores any
ordering of records in a file. Also gone are the strong connections that
characterize the network model. Connections are permitted by a much
weaker form of "logical" association. It doesn't mean the connections are
not there, but the connections are not important to what the model
characterizes.
Among the delicatessens of data management, relational data models
represent an open buffet with trays of breads, meats and cheeses ready for
customers to make their own sandwich.
The relational model has superior storage qualities. You see the
similar storage mechanism at play in grocery stores, farmer's markets, apple
barrels, pantries. and walk-in freezers.
|
Entity-Relationship (E-R)
If the relational model is like a buffet of
different sandwich ingredients, the ER model is like a picture of a sandwich
on the wall over the buffet that reminds consumers how the sandwich is
supposed to look. Or, like the mouth-watering image on packaged products
labelled "serving suggestion."
Put the grilled frankfurters next to the buns and mustard.
|
Object-Oriented (O-O)
The flat file model took a loaf of bread and sliced it up in order to make
the bread useful for sandwiches. The OO approach would be to start with
bread-like objects (e.g., biscuits, rolls, crackers, tortillas, buns, bagels,
wafers, muffins, pita, macaroni).
The flat file approach cuts things up into simpler bite-sized pieces of
almost constant consistency. OO considers objects to be almost
a complicated as the original. They are just on a smaller scale. OO
sees the process of preparing a banquet as multiple instances of
preparing a meal for one person.
The flat file slices just kind of lie there and need to be processed by
something external. OO includes a notion of making objects
self-responsive. It's kind of like the self-service lines in fast food
restaurants.
|
Multi-dimensional (M-D)
Unplanned transformations.
Most other data models are going to look at a fruitcake as a sweetbread
with fruit and nut mixture. The multi-dimensional approach says that
sometimes that makes sense, but sometimes you want to be able to look at
fruitcake as a piece of fruit surrounded by sweetbread.
Separating wheat from chaff. Grinding ingredients to create flour or
hamburger. Could make meat loaf, beef pot pie, or turkey stuffing.
|
Future
Of course, we have no idea what it might be called. Someone will always
be able to create a new kind of sandwich.
 | Bon
appetite! |
|